Sound Emitting Flame and Water Droplet Formation
by T. Takács
AEKI School
Tata, March
26-28, 2008
Contents
·
prelude: Structure of
Sound Emitting Flames, MSc thesis, 1987
·
experiments
objective: optical and acoustic study of steady and quasiperiodic premixed flame fronts on slot burner with changing gas
mixing ratios
·
results
·
fire,
sound and water droplet: from similarity to analogy
·
The Experiment
·
experimental setup is
shown below
·
its elements:
o burner head with a 1x100 mm
horizontal slot,
o a gas pipe and an air pipe was connected to the burner head
in which gases have been naturally mixed,
o volumetric flow rate of town
gas (Vg) was controlled by a tap and volumetric flow rate of air (Vl)
was changed by a tiristor controller (air was supplied from vacuum hoover) and
both measured by rotameters,
o premixed free jet flame of the
mixture is studied above the burner slot (blue arrow below),
·
devices:
o optical part: a stroboscope, a fast
camera and a schlieren device with
color strip filter to make flame shape photos,
o rotameters to measure volumetric flows
of air and gas,
o acoustic part: a microphone and
a memory oscilloscope to registrate sound
Sketch-plan of the
Experimental Setup


Results
·
method: air flow rate
was set step by step and gas flow rate was changed to investigate flame
behavior, sound and shape were detected
·
flame front: the
surface where burning occurs, separating fresh unburnt gas from the burner head
and burnt gas on the other side of the front (in red circles on photos
afterwards), its position is determined by flow and burning velocity
·
observed flame fronts:
o 1 steady „bell” (regular flame
front shape),
o 2 steady left-S* (see on photo) or right-S* (gas was ignited from left or
right perpendicular to slot longer axis), when the burning speed was not able
to close the front to steady bell having been less than the flow velocity
o 3 quasi-steady bell (sound
emitting state)
(*: S-shapes rather stable at
mixture ratio when flame produced sound)


·
sound observation:
characteristics of flame sound 600-1100 Hz and 80-90 dB occured at certain
gas-air mixture ratios
·
deformation and break of laminar flame front could be detected optically (below the longitudinal axis is
perpendicular to the plain of the photo):

·
sound emission
occured only when the mixture was
burning
·
sound occured only
when „bubbles” are separated from the flame front tip
·
hydrodynamically
non-turbulent flame emits sound! (photo at right shows the sensitivity of
schlieren method)
·
sound could not be
tuned out by inserting several screw nuts in the burning head so resonance was
excluded
·
flame shot in sound
emitting state with a slightly rotated burner head (cylindrical structures on
side view):




·
supposed reason for sound
emission: burning of periodically separating gas bubbles
·
map of sound emission
can be seen on figure to the right (x = Vl air flow rate, y = Vg gas flow rate):

·
scaled amplitude(t)
and its Fourier transformation power(f) of measured sound
o on the right figure the first hump at cca. 300 Hz is from
vacuum hoover (air supply), the second one cca. 700 Hz is by the flame

·
main findings:
o steady flame fronts: different stable shapes have been
detected
o at certain mixture ratios very intensive sound occured
from the flame with around 90 dB and frequency between cca. 600 and 1100 Hz
§ flame shape was filmed when sound was produced
§ flame sound was recorded by memory oscilloscope
§ even non-turbulent flame can produce combustion sound
·
possible explanation:
sound is produced by periodically detached flame front bubbles, the fresh gas
burns inward the bubble generating sound – may be checked in gas boilers as
well
·
where can we find
similar „bubbling” in nature?
·
obvious visual similarity can be noticed with water droplet formation on bottom of
horizontal plain or jet bridges in fluid splash
·
mathematical
description of water droplet detachment was given in Science (X.D. Shi et al.
1994)


·
PDES to describe water
breakup here is similar to flame front equation system so there is a
mathematical analogy behind visual similarity!
·
See next photo. liquid splash form is compared
with sound emitting flame front shape.


That’s all folks!
Comments
Post a Comment